HADLEY v. EXTREME TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

161103225; A151851.

355 P.3d 132 (2015)

272 Or. App. 49

Claude HADLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EXTREME TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a corporation doing business under the assumed business name of Bow Tech, Defendant-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided June 24, 2015.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Travis Eiva , Portland, argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellant.

Todd R. Johnson argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Hershner Hunter, LLP, Eugene.

Before DUNCAN, Presiding Judge, and LAGESEN, Judge and WOLLHEIM, Senior Judge.


Defendant, Extreme Technologies, Inc., designs, manufactures, and sells archery equipment, including bows. When plaintiff, Claude Hadley, agreed to share with defendant his idea for a new bow design, which was unknown in the industry at the time, the parties entered into a nondisclosure agreement. Under the agreement, defendant agreed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases