1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. SENNE v. OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF BASEBALL
 

SENNE v. OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF BASEBALL

Case No. 3:14-cv-00608-RS-EDL.

AARON SENNE, et al., Individually and on Behalf of All Those Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF BASEBALL, an unincorporated association doing business as MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL; et al.; Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Francisco Division.

September 4, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

STEPHEN M. TILLERY (pro hac vice), GARRETT R. BROSHUIS (pro hac vice), GIUSEPPE S. GIARDINA (pro hac vice), KOREIN TILLERY, LLC, St. Louis, MO, GEORGE A. ZELCS (pro hac vice), KOREIN TILLERY, LLC, Chicago, IL BRUCE L. SIMON PEARSON, SIMON & WARSHAW, LLP, San Francisco, CA, DANIEL L. WARSHAW , BOBBY POUYAM , PEARSON, SIMON & WARSHAW, LLP, Sherman Oaks, California, Attorneys for all Plaintiffs, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated

Kelly M. Dermody , Anne B. Shaver , LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP, San Francisco, CA, Rachel Geman (pro hac vice), LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP, New York, NY, Randall K. Pulliam (pro hac vice), CARNEY BATES & PULLIAM, PLLC, Little Rock, AR, Brian P. Murray (pro hac vice), Lee Albert (pro hac vice), GLANCY BINKOW & GOLDBERG LLP, New York, NY, Attorneys for Plaintiffs.

Alan M. Rifkin (pro hac vice), Joyce E. Smithey (pro hac vice), Celeste Bruce (pro hac vice), RIFKIN, WEINER, LIVINGTSON, LEVTAN & SILVER, LLC, Annapolis, MD, Attorneys for Baltimore Orioles Inc. and Baltimore Orioles, L.P. Elise M. Bloom (pro hac vice), Howard L. Ganz , Neil H. Abramson (pro hac vice), Adam M. Lupion (pro hac vice), PROSKAUER ROSE LLP, New York, NY, Laura L. Reathaford , PROSKAUER ROSE LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Attorneys for Defendants(except Baltimore Orioles, Inc. and Baltimore Orioles, L.P.).

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE THE HEARING ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO APPOINT INTERIM CO-LEAD COUNSEL

RICHARD SEEBORD, District Judge

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between Plaintiffs and Defendants, by and through their respective counsel, as follows:

WHEREAS, on August 19, 2014 Plaintiffs renoticed their Motion for Appointment of Interim Co-Lead Class Counsel to be heard on September 11, 2014; and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases