1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 838 F.3d
  5. 838 F.3d 1236 (2016)
 

HUSKY INJECTION MOLDING v. ATHENA AUTOMATION LTD.

2015-1726, 2015-1727.

838 F.3d 1236 (2016)

HUSKY INJECTION MOLDING SYSTEMS LTD., Appellant v. ATHENA AUTOMATION LTD., Cross-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided: September 23, 2016.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

MATTHEW L. CUTLER, Harness, Dickey & Pierce, PLC, St. Louis, MO, argued for appellant.

MARSHALL JOHN SCHMITT, Michael Best & Friedrich, LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for cross-appellant. Also represented by GILBERTO EDUARDO ESPINOZA, MARTIN L. STERN.

JOSEPH MATAL, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, SCOTT WEIDENFELLER.

Opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part filed by Circuit Judge Plager.

Husky Injection Molding Systems Ltd. ("Husky") appeals from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Patent Trial and Appeal Board's ("the Board") inter partes review decision finding claims 1, 4-16, 18, and 20-22 of U.S. Patent 7,670,536 ("the '536 patent") anticipated. Athena Automation Ltd. v. Husky Injection Molding...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases