1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 489 N.W.2d
  5. 489 N.W.2d 798 (1992)
 

PEDRO v. PEDRO

No. C6-92-137.

489 N.W.2d 798 (1992)

Alfred PEDRO, Respondent, v. Carl PEDRO, Jr., et al., Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied October 20, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Margaret M. Leighton, John Paul Martin, Petersen, Tews & Squires, Steven A. Clapp, Minneapolis, for respondent.

Roger A. Christianson, Christianson & Todd, Patricia J. Hartmann, St. Paul, for appellants.

Considered and decided by NORTON, P.J., and LANSING and DAVIES, JJ.

OPINION

NORTON, Judge.

After a request for dissolution of The Pedro Companies by respondent, Alfred Pedro, appellants, Carl and Eugene Pedro and The Pedro Companies, moved that the action proceed as a buyout pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 302A.751 (1990).

After a jury awarded damages, this court determined the jury's verdict was merely advisory and remanded the case to the trial court to make findings. Pedro v. Pedro, 463...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases