1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 343 F.Supp.
  5. 343 F.Supp. 101 (1972)
 

UNITED STATES v. DiVARCO

No. 72 CR 177.

343 F.Supp. 101 (1972)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Joseph DiVARCO and Joseph Arnold, Defendants.

United States District Court, N. D. Illinois, E. D.

June 6, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael P. Siavelis, Asst. U. S. Atty., Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff.

John Powers Crowley, Crowley & Nash, Chicago, Ill., for defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

WILL, District Judge.

The government is prosecuting the defendants in this case pursuant to an indictment which charges each of them with having made "a false statement as to a material matter on their respective 1965 United States Individual Income Tax Return," in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7206(1), in that each reported income from commissions paid them by Chemical Mortgage & Investment Corporation never having received any income...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases